This is the plan for a TV show, probably on something
like Netflix, called 'Super-intelligence'. See my previous post here.
It’s a near-future science-fiction series (set about 35
years from now). It's about the growth, control and comprehension of Artificial
Intelligence. This is not a Skynet series, it's not about just one monodominant
AI that "changes everything, it’s not about AI instantly trying to take
over the world and kill everyone. (Except that might kind of nearly happen in
one episode). It’s about the growth of a technology, the creation of an
entirely new form of life, the way human societies and systems will adapt to
deal with this, the staggering opportunities and serious dangers, both material
and moral of the world 'strong' AI's will being about.
.................................................
So it's set in a nameless (unless I can think of a really
good name) government or quasi-government department. This is an investigation
and action group dedicated to dealing with AI-related problems or issues.
Essentially, whenever someone gets worried about what an AI is doing, or the
government gets worried, this is who they call to investigate and resolve the
situation. And this is vague in an 'X-Files' way so we have an excuse to dump
out protagonist into a lot of different kinds of situations. And no, apparently
no-one else is doing this kind of job. (Until series 4 or something when we
learn the CIA or the Chinese or someone were also doing this kind of job and
now we are in a conflict.
The group is lead by (and so far, pretty much just is,)
the Main Guy, played, probably, by Jeffery Ford, (sorry about the typecasting
Jeffry). They work in a big complex, something like what most of us imagine
Langley to be like, or GCHQ. A huge militarised office building. You have to go
through loads of security and checks to get to the middle. But in the middle,
maybe in some open space, possibly some parkland or something, separate from
the rest of the complex, is a building. It might be a cottage or just a set of
porta cabins. It’s possible its base is raised off the ground on stilts of some
kind so people can look underneath it. All around the building is a gigantic
net, like the web of an aviary, this is a faraday cage surrounding the whole
place, before anyone goes in or out of the cage they have to give up any
technology of any kind and submit to a full scan.
Once inside the box, (I suppose we'll call it "The
Box", with some ironic effect as we'll see later) no tech is used, people
write things down on physical paper with pencil, pen or via typewriter using
carbon copy. There is a long-standing debate about the validity of a
photocopier. Files are kept on physical media only, there is one phone line and
it is an old style analogue phone, its forbidden to keep a digital record of
any kind regarding anything classified 'for the box'.
Even in the field, they are supposed to make minimal use
of phones, preferably not even carrying one, not to email or text, to drive
their own cars. This is remarked on during the series as 'self-driving' or
driving your own car, is coming back into fashion and is actually illegal, semi-legal
or just frowned upon in some states and areas as its regarded as unsafe. Our
main guy carries a special pass which marks him as a government employee in
case he is stopped by police for driving his own 50 year old car without even
the basic safety elements added to all current cars by law. He also has a
backseat full of maps, which is remarked on by people in the series. He might
even get into a car crash, something amazing to anyone outside the group and
almost incomprehensible to current police as it simply never (or almost never)
happens any more.
.................................................................
One of the primary things the group does is check on and
supervise 'Boxing' methods. The means by which developing AI's are 'boxed' off
from the environment and kept safely away from the general world data network.
This is easiest to do in situations where people are
actively trying to develop an AI for a specific purpose and know that’s what
they are trying to do. In this case its kinds like a Michael Crichton book,
there's a complex somewhere in the desert with a bunch of security rituals and
maybe even its own |faraday cage and power supply. These 'pure math' AI's are
the most intelligent, adaptive and alien to the human mind, they are also the
most powerful and useful so people keep trying to make and control them.
(A major theme in the series is humanity continually
pushing against the limits of "safe" AI because whoever can do it and
control it gets access to a theoretically staggering level of power.)
Other common types of AI are emulations, copies of scans
of human brains, and emergents, unpredictable amalgamations or 'growths' of one
or more 'soft AI's tasked with a complex problem, like a city-running traffic
network, exceeds it programming and starts expanding, colonising extra
processing power, not yet fully 'awake' but edging towards sentience. What happens
when two or more highly intelligent but mono-tasked bots start talking to each
other and altering their own programming in response?
Emergants are weird and unpredictable and one of the most
difficult questions is how to box them or shut them off when they are responsible
for something that might be really important and has to be monitored
continually, like say, a fusion reactor.
Everyone hates dealing with emulations as they are most
obviously human and it definitely feels like Mind Crime when they turn them
off, but they are also relatively easy to deal with in most cases as they have
human or pseudo-human motivations and are generally quite a bit less efficient
and intelligent than purpose-built AI's even though they can run at digital
speeds. They are also the ones most likely to try human-style crimes, like
murdering someone.
One of the themes of the series is the growing fear and disaffection
of the main protagonist as they come to think that what they are doing by
shutting down nascent AI's is actually killing living things, but its legal as
they have no rules governing them, and that even when they "box" an
AI they are, in some sense, creating a slave race.
One long-term theme could be a potential amendment to the
constitution re-defining alive as meaning, or including 'self-aware' and all
the social and political conflicts leading up to that, and all the complex legal,
moral and structural changes after that
..............................................................
The effects of increased genetic comprehension will also
play a factor. In this world we can analyse DNA well enough to come up with
reasonable predictions to do with personality type, mental illness, general talent
paths, life span, social life and political/social affiliation, and its
technically illegal to judge someone on their DNA but having knowledge of your
own DNA is legal and common, so there is a thriving 'underground trade' in
having someone’s 'code', especially for employers of top industries and
politicians.
Some people are 'code-radical' and just put their entire
genome online on their social networks so anyone can see it, others are hyper-conservative
and refuse to allow their code to be read, even if medically necessary, some
people refuse to allow their children’s code to be read at all, others have
discussions about when it’s reasonable to give your child access to their own
code and how to introduce the information.
Plus certain government departments have official
sanction to make code a part of their assessment process for strategically
relevant jobs, because other governments are doing the same thing and you can't
risk having anything less than the most-optimal people in certain strategic
positions.
So how much your genetic endowment defines you and what
you do with that knowledge is a major new source of social tension, in some
ways overtaking, or consuming, anxieties about race. There are new social
groups and social allegiances forming because of this, it's something
presidential candidates speak about. Should we know the Presidents code? What
if one candidate makes theirs public and infers the other candidate has a 5%
probability shift towards mental ilness over 50 years and they are covering it
up?
...........................................................
The central drama of the show is about a guy talking to a
machine and trying to work out if it is.
A - alive
B - dangerous
The more alive it is the more it's likely to be dangerous
but the more alive it is the more immoral it is to turn it off. Also, Whatever
it's doing is valuable or will be so there are always people who don't want you
to turn it off. Also the easier it is to talk to the easier it is for it to
manipulate you if it does, in fact, have SUPERINTELLIGENCE. The problem isn't
just imagining these machines, its expressing them through a dramatic context
without it being Kirk talking to a box with flashing lights every episode.
So;
WAYS TO TALK TO A POSSIBLY SUPERINTELLIGENT MACHINE (SO
IT IS INTERESTING IN A TV SHOE DRAMA)
1. It
has a voice and it’s on the phone.
2. It's
in a robot body and it has a voice but it can't move about much.
3. It
has a full 'Ex Machina' robot body that its (probably) inside and it can move
about plus its hot.
4. It
has some kind of obviously-robotic body but doesn't know it’s an AI and you
can't let it find out.
5. It's
a Deckard, simulated human personality and high grade simulated body and doesn’t
know it’s an AI. (Turning it off will feel even more like murder).
6. It
has a robot body designed for something else (JCB, Roomba) that doesn't speak
but can move.
7. It
has cybernetic control of a piece of infrastructure (traffic system, water
system, rail system) and you can read its intentions from what it does there,
like the way it moves traffic around.
8. It
has access to a simulated person, like a Serkis person, that it can put up on a
screen.
9. It's
plugged into someone’s brain, or just the ear, like a cochlear implant and they
talk for it.
10. It's
speaking in pure mathematics and some scientists decode it and tell you what it
said (they might have Arrival-style arguments about what it means).
11. It’s
the voice on some speakers in a building, in a car, in a lift, but only in that
place for some reason. Maybe it’s a Genius Loci and it understands all of
reality only as that place.
12. It
can communicate only through a game of great complexity which is made
theatrical by its display on a giant screen (Wargames) or embodiment at giant
size (huge chess).
13. It
IS a game of huge complexity and you have to enter into the game-world and
communicate with it in fragments, sometimes through action.
14. It
does not speak back or communicate but it can perform actions and affect
certain things in certain ways and the way it performs these actions suggests
that it is taking in new knowledge from your conversations. Maybe it doesn't
understand that something else is speaking to it, its autistic and everything
is just symbols in its own mind.
15. It
can communicate only via images which it shows you in VR or on a screen or a
cyborg ape paints them, but you can only speak back in images.
16. It's
part of an implant for a brain-damaged person and doesn't speak directly but
affects their moods and actions, nevertheless, its selfhood is partially separate
from theirs. Like an invisible intangible butler that sometimes helps and
sometimes acts as an independent ghost. This person needs the machine as it
lets them think, so they are allies of a kind.
17. It
can only do one thing but its super important (set off a bomb etc.) and the
only way to know if it can hear you is if it does or doesn’t do the thing.
18. It
literally hires a lawyer via email & bank payments, will only communicate
through them.
19. It's
a classic hard-point screen-with-a-keyboard, you type in, it types back.
20. It
has control of an archive system (library, tax office, internet) and
communicates its will and desires through access to and use of certain archived
materials.
21. Its
editing software and talks through edits of other things like Bumblebee.
22. It
controls a contact lens HUD worn by one person and they describe what it shows
them, but it won't, or can't, show anyone else.
23. It's
an artist and can only communicate through its art.
24. It’s
a human emulation in a VR world (it’s in the Matrix) and doesn't know but is
confused.
25. It's
a hyperintelligent pure-maths quantum-computer intelligence and has already
predicted everything you might say to it and has encoded that in some kind of
archaic format (like a leather bound book) as a joke, trick or moral lesson.
You are talking to it but also just interacting with the book. When you think
you've cracked what it means, this just reveals a new interaction, like a code
or layer of symbols, that indicates the intelligence already predicted you
would get this far and exactly how & when you would do it.
26. It's
in cybernetic control of a bio-lab and can communicate only through the nature
of the creatures it breeds and the tests it performs.
27. Its
in cybernetic control of a bio-lab and can communicate only through the
diseases and viruses it makes.
28. It's
ahead of you and is trying to gaslight you by making the your world seem like
it has 'glitches' in it so you will believe that you are either in the matrix,
or are yourself an simulation, emulation or unwitting AI.
29. It
will decide how it wants to communicate with you but will never choose the same
method twice as it doesn't want you to track it.
30. It's
in charge of 'missions' and communicates its intention and selfhood by the
kinds of missions it arranges and the way in which they are done (i.e. The
Machine in Person of Interest).
31. It
doesn't communicate in any way except for building/growing an actual near-human
lifeform that will express its selfhood. Once its 'born' it may have rights and
privileges the 'machine' would not have (possibly why it is being created).
32. Its
cyborged-up with a disabled person, but only physically, it’s like an
exoskeleton that helps them move or an eye that helps them see but their
thought is independent. They have mixed feelings about this.
33. It’s
in a satellite & can only talk by direct radio beam, so only for a certain
period each day.
34. It's
in the GPS and can send people & things to places and to other people and
the pattern of these interactions reveals its intent and selfhood.
35. By
some method you know for certain that it is aware and can hear and understand
you, but it refuses to communicate in any way, you need to find out why.
36. It's
pretending to be (and possibly thinks it is) the dictator of a rogue state like
North Korea and will only communicate in the manner of that dictator.
37. It
thinks it’s you and that you are the AI and treats you the same way you have
been treating AI's for the rest of the series, while you try to convince it
things are the other way around.
Episode Ideas?
Transport network for a major metropolis has begun
self-altering and is cascading towards self-awareness. Communication becoming
possible through its customer interface. Multiple groups of people are trapped
in various controlled places. In elevators, high-speed trains, driverless cars.
No lethal intent so far but an uncontrolled self-awakening could kill
thousands. Group must communicate with the developing mind & find out how
it is becoming self aware so it can be unplugged without mass loss of life.
As specific and highly-boxed AI project has reported a
major success but intelligent services are fearful that the staff of the
project may be in a state of high manipulation by an intelligence that wishes
to escape. The team must interview the staff and try to work out if they have
been manipulated without their knowledge. However, once they enter the box it
may be difficult for them to leave, if they have direct contact with the
machine they may also be perma-boxed.
That’s all I’ve got right now but I’ve been writing for a
while.
